There has been much written over the past several months about what the proper role of the Superdelegates is: Should they should vote with their precinct/district/state? Should they exercise their independent judgment as to who they feel is most likely to win in the fall? For what it's worth from a technical, party standpoint I think the Supers should exercise their own judgment, should not be bound by local primary/caucus results, but would need an exceedingly good reason to overturn the results of the primary process no matter how close (and the way the rules are set up, a prolonged two-person race will ALWAYS be very close). However I would like to submit a different consideration beyond the party: That you do what is best for the country.
↧